1. Unfolding challenges in marine policy across Europe ​
About Lesson
Policy coherence: How well different policies work together
It can be defined as the extent to which policies reinforce each other by promoting synergies or reducing conflicts between their objectives and measures both in design and implementation.
Horizontal vs Vertical coherence
Policy coherence can be assessed within the same governance level (horizontal) or across diffent governance levels (vertical)

Further examples

Horizontal coherence across objectives and measures can be evaluated between policies within the same policy area, such as between a policy on urban wastewater and wider EU water policy. It can also be evaluated between policies from different policy areas which may have to work together, such as between water policy and agricultural policy.

Policy landscapes at the EU and (sub)national levels are fragmented. Policies addressing specific sectors, activities or problems also often directly or indirectly affect other sectors and problems. As a result, various policies apply simultaneously to specific (sector) activities or (parts of) environmental problems.

An evaluation of horizontal coherence may help identifying excessive burdens, overlaps, gaps, inconsistencies, implementation problems, and/or obsolete measures. An evaluation may also help identifying potential synergies across policies and policy areas that could be strengthened. This can improve the overall performance of policies.

Vertical coherence may involve evaluating whether national policies are in line with the objectives of the European Green Deal, or whether certain national policies are consistent with the overarching environmental goals from the EU Climate Law, the proposed Nature Restoration Regulation, or the EU Directives. Vertical coherence can also be assessed at lower levels of governance, for example between municipality regulations and national policies.

In the EU, large parts of the policies (namely EU Directives) need to be transposed into national legislation. This means that states must incorporate the EU rules into national law. Even though states have some flexibility in the ways of incorporation, coherence towards the original directives should be ensured. After transposition, the policies become effective at the national level. To illustrate, the Water Framework Directive must be transposed into national law and implemented by producing river basin management plans that address water quality problems.

Coherence to reach compliance

It is important to remember that coherence is not an end-goal in itself. Policy coherence is a mechanism that ensures that we achieve synergies and win-win outcomes in policy making, contributing to cross-compliance. 

Compliance in legal terms
Is about transposing and applying legal requirements correctly and promptly. Usually this concerns compliance in relation to a single policy with specific objectives.
Cross-Compliance in CrossGov
refers to the concurrent achievement and realization of multiple Green Deal policies, along their associated goals and targets. This requires studying not only the extent to which policies are adhered to, but also the results of the implementation (outcomes and impacts).
Cross-compliance is not a black and white phenomenon
Complying with specific EGD related targets can negatively affect achieving other targets. In policy landscapes with low coherence, cross-compliance with multiple targets is in jeopardy and trade-offs often need to be made.
Some examples....
The EU Green Deal has set the target to expand Europe’s offshore wind energy capacity to 60GW by 2030. This will require the expansion of offshore wind energy installations, with potential consequences for biodiversity and ecosystems. The construction and operation of offshore wind energy installations may destroy habitats, displace species or disrupt nursery sites, feeding areas or migratory routes. Without careful planning, the drive to increase Europe’s offshore wind energy capacity might conflict with targets on restoration.
Some examples...
Applying nature positive designs in offshore wind energy installations may further contribute to positive effects for biodiversity. Thus, developing offshore wind energy as a climate change mitigation measure may concurrently enhance and protect biodiversity. In this way, achieving the 60GW offshore wind energy target may contribute to the restoration of degraded ecosystems, and support achieving positive trend for habitats and species.
Given a high level of coherence,
policies can also positively reinforce one another by creating synergies that facilitate achieving other Green Deal related targets. At a minimum though, a policy should not hinder progress towards reaching other policies’ objectives and targets.
Adapted from Nilsson et al. (2012)

References

Nilsson, Måns, Tony Zamparutti, Jan Erik Petersen, Björn Nykvist, Peter Rudberg, and Jennifer McGuinn. 2012. “Understanding Policy Coherence: Analytical Framework and Examples of Sector–Environment Policy Interactions in the EU.” Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (6): 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589.

0% Complete